Hong Kong University is one of the top universities in the region. But right now, its students are not happy.

Every single person I have met in Hong Kong thus far has mentioned this. The vice-premier of the People’s Republic of China, Li Keqiang, had visited Hong Kong, and been to Hong Kong University (HKU). While he had been there, the campus had been filled with police, and people who hadn’t been invited were kept away. Three student protesters complained of having been manhandled, with one saying that he had been locked up for an hour. You can read more about it here.

A man living in a residential area the vice-premier had visited was also stopped by the police for “breaching a security area” because he was wearing a T-shirt asking for universal suffrage for the Tiananmen Square crackdown. On 22 August 2011, 300 journalists marched to the police headquarters in Wan Chai to protest against the security measures that had been taken, which meant that they had been unable to get up close to the vice-premier to ask questions.

I’d always known that the people of Hong Kong were proud of their liberties, but I had no idea just how fiercely they would protect them. But this evening I sat in my grandma’s tiny apartment and watched the live coverage of the rally HKU students had arranged to protest the way the police and university had handled the whole event.

It was all very orderly. They had boxes put out front, with labels for students, alumni and the public. People would put their names in their respective boxes, and if your name was pulled out of the box you would get 3 minutes to speak. It was the same for everyone from the students right up to the vice-chancellor of HKU itself; everyone got the same amount of time and the same treatment regardless of age or status. The MC reminded people to listen to each other, and calmed the crowd down when they got worked up. It could get loud, but it wasn’t dangerous or anything.

In the big scheme of things, a student being locked up for an hour isn’t that big a deal. No one died, no one was beaten or tortured. But for the students of HKU, it was a blemish on their proud tradition of freedom, democracy and openness. And they weren’t afraid to stand up and be counted, to speak out and hold those in charge accountable. Because of their outcry, the vice-chancellor of the university, Tsui Lap Chee, had to publish an apology, as well as miss a conference in Shanghai so he could be at their rally. My grandma also told me that the law faculty of HKU has also offered to help the manhandled students sue the police.

It wasn’t a particularly “happening” rally, and apart from the endless stream of 3-minute speeches nothing much happened. But as a Singaporean, I was fascinated.

Of course, in Singaporean context this would not happen. Such a public gathering would be illegal, and with the laws against illegal assembly (where one person can also constitute an illegal assembly), the locking up of the student would have been justified as legal in the first place.

But what about our university students? Do they have the fire that I saw within the students of HKU?

I never studied in any of Singapore’s universities, so I’ll be very grateful if those who have would share their experience. But from my visits to the various campuses, I have always observed that our tertiary education institutions have been extremely depoliticised, where students are not supposed to be able to go into controversial topics or discuss local politics or carry out peaceful demonstrations to express their views. Which is a pity, because all over the world universities are some of the most politicised places you will find.

When I was Wintec and then Victoria University in New Zealand, the walls of the buildings were often covered with posters. Many of them would be for indie bands and amateur theatre performances, but there would also be campaign posters, as well as posters for peaceful demonstrations and gatherings and protests. You might not want to join a protest, but it was always clear to all that if you had something to say, you could come out and say it without fear. And then you could be prepared for the exchange, the discussion and the debate.

But on the campuses of NUS and NTU and SMU, the walls often seem to be bare and scrubbed clean. Once in awhile I’ll see posters announcing some campus event, always something neutral and innocuous. Where is the fire?

After all, university is where we come face to face with our convictions, and everything we believe in is put to the test. Everyone has a view and everyone has an opinion, and everyone wants to prove something. Debates rage. Ideals are born and passion bubbles over. The fire burns within each young soul. This is what it means to be in university, to start emerging into the world and into society as an adult, and to learn about life and what it means. A university without politics, a university that does not give all argument an equal chance to be proposed and judged in the marketplace of ideas, is a university without a soul.

And once the universities start losing their soul, you know that the soul of a society will not be far behind.

Tagged with:
 
  • Valerie Yeo

    I studied in NUS. I was part of the Student Council where minutes had to be taken and handed to the Administration.

  • http://kixes.wordpress.com Kirsten

    Wah, really? Why did they want your minutes?

  • http://whatsaysyou.wordpress.com whatsaysyou

    Kirsten, thanks for bringing this matter up in the post. I got friends from Malaysia who tell me that going on student rallies is totally out of the question just like what you have in Singapore. It is also considered illegal in Malaysia too. Tertiary students in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia can go on a rally without getting busted by the cops. I agree that university is not just a place for learning but also encouraging people to speak out and think outside the box. You have a point that when universities start losing their souls, the soul of a society will not be far behind.

  • Chen J.Y.

    Hello Kirsten,

    Well, I can’t speak for all the full-time NTU students, but us part-time NTU students are quite a lively lot. Maybe, it is because we have many students from overseas: Thailand, Myanmar, e.t.c. An example will be this message from a Thai friend who went home earlier this year:

    “Sometimes I don’t know what u S’poreans are complaining about. Look at Ms. Tin Pei Ling. She is only taking care of and representing an area smaller than one of the minor villages in my country. We are going to elect a complete novice to be PM of my whole country! Ms. Tin is a puppet candidate? U have seen nothing yet! At least Ms. Tin could claim to have done 7 yrs of grassroots work while Ms. Yingluck is a true businesswoman! Sure, compared to Ms. Tin, Ms. Yingluck is pretty, eloquent in public, e.t.c. but u know what? We are not electing Ms. World! Hey Yong, let have a bet, shall we? S$50, double or nothing! We will bet on which country will be run more like a corporation for the next 5 yrs: yours or mine?”

    [Message reproduced with permission BUT edited for conciseness, obscenities]

    Weelll, when he put it like that, now he made me feel guilty of excessive Tin.P.L.-bashing. To all who are interested, I am betting on Thailand and my Thai friend is betting on S’pore. Yes, NTU students are funny this way.

  • Chen J.Y.

    Hello Kirsten,

    I hope u are ready for the fire that burns within this young soul. How can i forget my NTU friend from India? He sent us a wordy email which basically screamed “How dare he appeal to the Supreme Court and ask for mercy from the president! He was caught on CCTV cameras shooting people and he DARE claimed to be innocent?!!”

    At first, none of us understand him until some of us opened the email attachment here: – http://epoch-archive.com/a1/en/sg/nnn/2011/03%20March%202011/Issue%20352_1%20March_2011/352_A2.pdf
    (article on lower right corner), then it become a case of “how could we forget?” He was, of course, talking about the 2008 Mumbai attacks: – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks
    in which a S’porean, among so many people, died for nothing just 3 yrs ago.

    I emailed him and asked him as discreetly as i can put it, if India does not have the death sentence, what will happen? His grim reply reminds me of the Broken windows theory that i read about in the book “Freakonomics” by Steven D. Levitt & Stephen J. Dubner: “My friend, my people have already lost some faith in the India justice system. If this murderer is spared, the prison walls may just collapse like the Berlin Wall when the victims’ families arrive in hordes to tear him apart with their bare hands. Justice must prevail or order will collapse!” My apologies to members of the movement We Believe in Second Chances but my India friend is NOT joking.

  • http://kixes.wordpress.com Kirsten

    It would be interesting to see what the full-time local NTU students would have to say. I’m certain that there are lively discussions on politics in universities even in Singapore, but I think it is very different. Discussing politics in terms of Singapore/Thailand is still in a way not that controversial as say, outright criticism and formal critique of Singapore’s politics and political parties.

  • Crystal

    This is radically different from US Universities. They are a HIGHLY political environment. We had student political organizations (campus repubs, campus dems), a feminist organization that did things like take back the night marches, environmental groups, etc. I was always seeing posters for political stuff.

    Historically in the US, some of the biggest momentum on civil rights came from college kids.

    I wouldn’t want my daughters going to a uni where they wouldn’t learn to find their voices.

  • Chen J.Y.

    Hello Kirsten,

    A conversation with one of my younger cousins reminds me of why S’porean students don’t like to argue in public (on the Web, it is another matter). If u have ever went through secondary school in S’pore, say, between 1980 to 2000, u might have gone through a system in which, for 4 years, English teachers tried to convince students to write narrative essays instead of argumentative essays. Apparently, they were afraid of us committing so many logical fallacies in writing an argumentative essay (abbreviation: arg esy) that we will fail the composition exam. In fact, my English teacher once gave us a multi-page article named “101 Ways Not To Write An Argumentative Essay” (actually i never checked if there was really 101 ways). She was personally convinced that even the brightest students will have problems writing argumentative essays under stressful exam conditions. She shared with us her experience over the years that some of the most common logical fallacies made by students attempting the arg esy were 1) excessive use of meaningless statistics; 2) what she called the ‘Appeal To Irrelevant Authority’ logical fallacy, eg. Suppose Linus Pauling, Two Times Nobel Prize winner, said that super-high doses of Vitamin C is good for your health. Great, except his first Nobel was for Chemistry, on the nature of chemical bonds and not really on vitamins. His second Nobel is the Peace Prize. When we appeal to authority, she warned us it better be relevant authority. I believe that this training to avoid attempting the arg esy is why S’porean students in general don’t argue in public.

  • http://kixes.wordpress.com Kirsten

    Perhaps that might be one reason too. My teachers also always convinced us never to write argumentative essays, because as you said, they thought it would be too difficult. I always thought the solution to that would be to teach us the critical thinking skills to make it work, but they never really did, which is a pity. I only ended up picking up those skills when I got a little more into debate for a short while in high school, and then when I went overseas.

    I think it might be a factor, but it’s probably less the “stay away from argumentative essays” alone than the culture it represents: a culture that tells students to shy away from sticking their neck out from the crowd and making their thoughts known.

  • http://kixes.wordpress.com Kirsten

    I wonder if it’s a calculated thing, that our universities are so depoliticised. It probably is, since everywhere around the world (and INCLUDING Singapore) when there were historic movements and displays of people power, university students were more often than not at the forefront. LKY himself had worked with numerous student unions when he was trying to gain power for his party.

    It’s that atmosphere of passion and ideas and opinions flying everywhere that really makes university what it is, I feel. People don’t remember university for all the studying they did, but for the people they’ve met and the revelations they’ve stumbled upon and the energy that buzzed through the campus. Having not been a student in local universities I can’t really say for sure that this doesn’t exist in Singapore, but from my observations it definitely seems to be less than what there was where I studied.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001968285913 Maya Phoenix

    And no prose too… the more boring and un-creative you are the better grades you will get. At least that’s my experience…