On 9 May 2011, TODAY reported MM Lee Kuan Yew as having made some indirect comments on the results of the General Elections 2011:
“2011 has seen a generation that does not remember from whence we came, but that is to be expected. But I do, and those amongst you who are over 50 will remember.”
As a young Singaporean and first-time voter, I can only assume that MM Lee was referring to my generation when he spoke of those who do not remember “from whence we came”. He seems to suggest that this is the reason why so many of us voted for alternative parties instead of the PAP.
I would just like to respectfully disagree.
Ever since we started with Social Studies in Primary 4, we have been taught Singapore’s history (of course, the accuracy and bias of this history that we learned is up for debate). We were taught about how Raffles came and “founded” us, turning us into a bustling port. We were taught about the Japanese Occupation during the Second World War, and how the people suffered all sorts of abuse and deprivation. We were taught about our fight for independence from British rule and we were taught about our separation from Malaysia. We were taught about how the PAP, together with the people, worked hard through all sorts of problems to build Singapore up into the fast-paced, successful city that it is today.
I did not only learn about this from textbooks in school. I also learned this from my grandparents, especially my grandfather, who always has wonderful stories to tell. As a child I was enthralled by the stories of “Old Singapore” that my elders had to tell; stories about how they grew up and what they did and what the city was like.
I have not forgotten “from when we came”. In fact, it is because I remember “from whence we came” that I voted the way I did.
Image from Yesterday.sg
I remember that our first leaders (MM Lee himself being one of them) were strong, brave people who were not afraid to speak out against the status quo, who were able to inspire and motivate Singaporeans to be brave, to take a leap, to fight for change. These leaders were not preoccupied with “track record”, and neither were they arrogant, nor did they take the people for granted. They were good leaders who were able to bring the people through difficult patches and make decisions that would benefit the country. The people had faith in them, and together everyone worked hard to build Singapore up.
These leaders were unafraid to speak out against repression, and to stand for democracy and freedom.
Repression, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love – it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict.
- Mr Lee Kuan Yew as an opposition PAP member speaking to David Marshall, Singapore Legislative Assembly, Debates, 4 October, 1956.
This is “from whence we came”. And I voted for leaders who I felt had this strength, this vision and this devotion to serve Singapore and Singaporeans. I voted for leaders who honoured this legacy.
Chia Thye Poh being arrested in 1966. He was released in 1989, but confined in Sentosa for another 9 years. The restrictions on him were only completely lifted in 1998.
While I remember all the good things that Singapore received from the leaders in the past, I also remember the bad. I remember the shock and the horror that I felt when I first read about Operation Coldstore and Operation Spectrum. I read about the people who were detained without trial for conspiracies unproven. I was scandalised by what had happened to Chia Thye Poh, who was imprisoned for 23 years without trial, then under house arrest for another 9 years. I listened in horror as these people, now released, spoke about how they were tortured and abused while detained. Vincent Cheng spoke about his experience recently during one of the SDP’s rallies:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmAtoS5t-Q]
This is “from whence we came”. Democracy was undermined and subverted when these people were detained and not given a fair trial. When they were beaten and tortured while in custody and made to sign false confessions. It was a sad day for justice and human rights when these things were allowed to happen. So I voted to lend my voice to the many others who also voted to make sure that these things would never happen again, that never again would we allow such blatant acts of injustice and abuse be carried out in our name.
So you see, I did not forget “from whence we came”. I remembered it, and voted so that not only would we be able to honour the good things we received “from whence we came”, we would also be able to make sure that things will be better where we are headed.



bookjunkie
May 11, 2011
I think he was referring to anyone below 50, so I guess I am still included in that category. But even my relatives who are over 60 and 70 who are well aware of the past, are just as disillusioned. So it’s not just the young who have examining everything more critically and removing the blinders.
In my time there was no social studies apart from what we learnt in our second language text books about historical figures including philanthropists like Tan Tock Seng, and I studied ancient history in lower secondary…Mesopotamia, Egypt etc….I was lucky.
TC
May 11, 2011
Kirsten, there is yet a future for Singapore because of young people like you! I am 20 years late to know the more complete history of Singapore. Keep going. Never, never, never, never, never give up!
leong
May 11, 2011
My mum is 83. It was she who advised us not to vote for the ruling party in this GE. My dad would have done the same if he were still alive.
She felt they have strayed too far from the one she had come to know during the foundation years.
I am glad us siblings heeded her advice.
Actually the older folks do remember whence we came from and make comparison.
kirsten
May 11, 2011
Yes, it the same with my grandfather. He is 86 this year and keeps saying that the new PAP is nowhere near what the old PAP was like.
I feel as if MM Lee had expected us to vote out of gratitude or even nostalgia, but the strength of leadership we had then cannot seem to be found in the new PAP. In fact I find that some of the opposition candidates are better leaders.
Alice
May 11, 2011
Kirsten,
There is hope yet for Singapore. When a young Singaporean such as yourself speak up and in such a rational and well thought out manner, I am filled with optimism for our future and our nation. Like your grandfather, my 91 year old father and 86 year old mother also voted for the opposition. My father was an active grass root leader in his “younger” days and was always a PAP supporter. This vote for the opposition is a FIRST for my parents.
They remember “from whence we came”. They remember the ministers then – Mr. S. Rajaratnam, Dr. Toh Chin Chye, Dr. Goh Keng Swee, Mr. Ong Pang Boon etc. They worked hard to improve the lot of Singaporeans and to build up the country. And because my parents remember, they have opted to vote for the opposition for they realized the new PAP has forgotten “from whence we came”.
gtk
May 12, 2011
pls dont compare the world we live in today is so different 40years ago, the world changes very very fast and many things happening today are different from the past and to adapt to this change we must move even faster to allow us to be in the same level. there will be more to come and it will move even faster in these 21st century.this is why george yeo and his team being asking aljunied grc to give them the mandate so that they can help to transform and do the changes for Singapore. I’m still very sadden till today we lost a dedicated foreign minster who love his job and his people in the Goverment.
PL
May 12, 2011
You took the words right out of my mouth
Having gone through the same hard core memorising study phase, the incumbent today is totally different from the fighters in the 1960 – 70s. Specific policies implemented in the recent years had stirred up resentment among the people. I felt that certain comments from MM may also had led to a “TPL effect”. I returned specially to SG for the election and the plane was packed. Most of us have been exposed to cultures overseas and definitely, SG has luxuries which other countries can only wish for and I believe citizens are grateful in that aspect. But in every stage of a growing economy, there will be a different set of issues. The important thing is not to be complacent.
homemaker
May 13, 2011
I am fortunate too as in my time we was not taught the PAP propaganda. It was only in recent years that I learnt from the alternative media the unspoken history of Singapore. In this election my parents who are in their 80s voted for opposition too.
I used to believe in the PAP government until 1991 when the residents in Nee Soon Central SMC voted in the opposition SDP. We were promptly denied a polyclinic in our constituency even though a plot of land was reserved for the Yishun Polyclinic. This is the punishment for voting in an opposition although the residents needed a polyclinic, we had to do without one. In its place, a children care centre and Yishun Medical Centre were set up.
Residents of Yishun finally got their polyclinic in 1997 when Nee Soon Central SMC residents accepted the carrot, in the form of the polyclinic, offered by PAP. Despite their unhappiness since they had spent a lot on setting up their clinics, the doctors in Yishun Medical Centre were forced to vacate the building.
I felt very disappointed. Aren’t our government supposed to serve the needs of the Singapore citizens? Now it seems that they are only in the PAP to serve their needs and interests.
a real person
May 29, 2011
the people that did all the ISA things and chia thye poh things are a very very evil lot. there is hope only if every one who knows about such things make and effor to tell a few others. we have to pass it on because the straits times is not passing it on.
National Debate Tournament
November 4, 2011
My brother suggested I may like this web site. He used to be totally right. This put up truly made my day. You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!
Winking Doll
May 12, 2012
Pingback: http://winkingdoll.blogspot.ca/2011/05/facebook-one-citizen-sheep-attempts-to.html